Graham Kendall
Various Images

Professor Graham Kendall

Professor Graham Kendall is the Provost and CEO of The University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus (UNMC). He is also a Pro-Vice Chancellor of the University of Nottingham.

He is a Director of MyResearch Sdn Bhd, Crops for the Future Sdn Bhd. and Nottingham Green Technologies Sdn Bhd. He is a Fellow of the British Computer Society (FBCS) and a Fellow of the Operational Research Society (FORS).

He has published over 230 peer reviewed papers. He is an Associate Editor of 10 journals and the Editor-in-Chief of the IEEE Transactions of Computational Intelligence and AI in Games.

News

How are university examinations scheduled?
http://bit.ly/1z0pG4s
I have published a number of papers on Cutting and Packing
http://bit.ly/dQPw7T

Latest Blog Post

Snooker: Celebrating 40 years at the Crucible

Random Blog Post

When Sports Rules Go Awry: How TheConversation led to a collaborative paper

Publication(s)

Hybrid Heuristic for Multi-carrier Transportation Plans
http://bit.ly/1dGGwqO
An Evolutionary Approach for the Tuning of a Chess Evaluation Function using Population Dynamics
http://bit.ly/dFh029
A Survey and Analysis of Diversity Measures in Genetic Programming
http://bit.ly/eA1Rvy
Computing Nash Equilibria and Evolutionarily Stable States of Evolutionary Games
http://bit.ly/24qGpHI

Graham Kendall: Details of Requested Publication


Citation

Hallam, N; Blanchfield, P and Kendall, G Handling diversity in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pages 2233-2240, 2005.


Abstract

In evolutionary multiobjective optimisation (EMO), the diversity of the set of non-dominated solutions used to be handled by the niching and fitness sharing technique. The main downside of this technique is the need to set the niche radius. Quite recently, new techniques have emerged and proved to be more successful. The grid-based density of the adaptive grid algorithm (AGA), the crowding-distance technique of the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II), and the archive truncation procedure of the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm (SPEA2) are the latest successful methods that ensure a better diversity than the traditional less effective and computationally expensive niching method. In this work, a crowding-dispersion technique which is based on the Pareto potential regions (PPR), is proposed and compared to three recent techniques.


pdf

You can download the pdf of this publication from here


doi

The doi for this publication is 10.1109/CEC.2005.1554972 You can link directly to the original paper, via the doi, from here

What is a doi?: A doi (Document Object Identifier) is a unique identifier for sicientific papers (and occasionally other material). This provides direct access to the location where the original article is published using the URL http://dx.doi/org/xxxx (replacing xxx with the doi). See http://dx.doi.org/ for more information



URL

This pubication does not have a URL associated with it.

The URL is only provided if there is additional information that might be useful. For example, where the entry is a book chapter, the URL might link to the book itself.


Bibtex

@INPROCEEDINGS{hpk2005, author = {N. Hallam and P. Blanchfield and G. Kendall},
title = {Handling diversity in evolutionary multiobjective optimization},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation},
year = {2005},
pages = {2233--2240},
abstract = {In evolutionary multiobjective optimisation (EMO), the diversity of the set of non-dominated solutions used to be handled by the niching and fitness sharing technique. The main downside of this technique is the need to set the niche radius. Quite recently, new techniques have emerged and proved to be more successful. The grid-based density of the adaptive grid algorithm (AGA), the crowding-distance technique of the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II), and the archive truncation procedure of the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm (SPEA2) are the latest successful methods that ensure a better diversity than the traditional less effective and computationally expensive niching method. In this work, a crowding-dispersion technique which is based on the Pareto potential regions (PPR), is proposed and compared to three recent techniques.},
doi = {10.1109/CEC.2005.1554972},
keywords = {evolutionary algorithm, multi-objective},
owner = {gxk},
timestamp = {2011.01.02},
webpdf = {http://www.graham-kendall.com/papers/hpk2005.pdf} }