Graham Kendall
Various Images

Professor Graham Kendall

Professor Graham Kendall is the Provost and CEO of The University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus (UNMC). He is also a Pro-Vice Chancellor of the University of Nottingham.

He is a Director of MyResearch Sdn Bhd, Crops for the Future Sdn Bhd. and Nottingham Green Technologies Sdn Bhd. He is a Fellow of the British Computer Society (FBCS) and a Fellow of the Operational Research Society (FORS).

He has published over 230 peer reviewed papers. He is an Associate Editor of 10 journals and the Editor-in-Chief of the IEEE Transactions of Computational Intelligence and AI in Games.

News

The hunt for MH370
http://bit.ly/1DXRLbu
If you are interested in hyper-heuristics, take a look at my publications in this area
http://bit.ly/efxLGg

Latest Blog Post

Snooker: Celebrating 40 years at the Crucible

Random Blog Post

Learning Java, the first steps

Publication(s)

Imperfect Evolutionary Systems
http://bit.ly/hC4SYn
Optimising risk reduction: An expected utility approach for marginal risk reduction during regulatory decision making
http://bit.ly/gBihFm
Is There a Role for Publication Consultants and How Should Their Contribution be Recognized?
http://bit.ly/2deZjSR
A New Model and a Hyper-heuristic Approach for Two-dimensional Shelf Space Allocation
http://bit.ly/1h1JAhT

Graham Kendall: Details of Requested Publication


Citation

Li, J; Kendall, G; Pollard, S; Soane, E; Davies, G and Bai, R A decision support approach for group decision making under risk and uncertainty. In In proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Logistics Systems and Intelligent Management, pages 1856-1860, 2010.


Abstract

Cost-benefit analysis has long been used in decision making about public health and security. Frequently, risk and uncertainty are involved, and benefit and cost are not evenly shared by all stakeholders in the activities where public welfare is concerned. The result of cost-benefit analysis may be controversial because it does not consider the conflict of interest among the stakeholders. In this paper, we propose a decision support approach that allows individual agents to make their own evaluations of benefit, cost and risk over available alternatives. Individual beliefs with respect to the alternatives will then be aggregated to form a group decision. This approach can also be used to integrate the cost benefit analysis into risk assessment. An application to this group decision making, considering the disposal of dead animals, is given.


pdf

You can download the pdf of this publication from here


doi

The doi for this publication is 10.1109/ICLSIM.2010.5461315 You can link directly to the original paper, via the doi, from here

What is a doi?: A doi (Document Object Identifier) is a unique identifier for sicientific papers (and occasionally other material). This provides direct access to the location where the original article is published using the URL http://dx.doi/org/xxxx (replacing xxx with the doi). See http://dx.doi.org/ for more information



URL

This pubication does not have a URL associated with it.

The URL is only provided if there is additional information that might be useful. For example, where the entry is a book chapter, the URL might link to the book itself.


Bibtex

@INPROCEEDINGS{lkpsdb2010, author = {J. Li and G. Kendall and S. Pollard and E. Soane and G. Davies and R. Bai},
title = {A decision support approach for group decision making under risk and uncertainty},
booktitle = {In proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Logistics Systems and Intelligent Management},
year = {2010},
pages = {1856--1860},
month = {9-10 Jan. 2010},
organization = {Harbin, China},
abstract = {Cost-benefit analysis has long been used in decision making about public health and security. Frequently, risk and uncertainty are involved, and benefit and cost are not evenly shared by all stakeholders in the activities where public welfare is concerned. The result of cost-benefit analysis may be controversial because it does not consider the conflict of interest among the stakeholders. In this paper, we propose a decision support approach that allows individual agents to make their own evaluations of benefit, cost and risk over available alternatives. Individual beliefs with respect to the alternatives will then be aggregated to form a group decision. This approach can also be used to integrate the cost benefit analysis into risk assessment. An application to this group decision making, considering the disposal of dead animals, is given.},
doi = {10.1109/ICLSIM.2010.5461315},
keywords = {Decision support approach, Cost-benefit analysis, Uncertainty, risk, Group decision making, Evidence support logic, Expected utility},
owner = {gxk},
timestamp = {2010.12.11},
webpdf = {http://www.graham-kendall.com/papers/lkpsdb2010.pdf} }