Graham Kendall
Various Images

Professor Graham Kendall

University of Nottingham, UK

I am a Professor of Computer Science at the University of Nottingham (UK). I am currently the Vice-Provost (Research and Knowledge Transfer) at our campus in Malaysia. I am a member of the Automated Scheduling, Optimisation and Planning (ASAP) Research Group. My interests include Operational Research, Evolutionary Computing, Scheduling (particularly sports scheduling), Cutting and Packing, Timetabling and Games (both games in the usual sense of the word as well as mathematical games such as the Iterated Prisoners Dilemma).

Latest Blog Post

My First Java Project

Random Blog Post

MISTA Conference: Almost There

News

I am a director of a spin out company that specialises in Nesting Software
http://bit.ly/i9wYHy

Publication

Competitive travelling salesmen problem: A hyper-heuristic approach
http://bit.ly/KgQhlh

Publication

Throughput Maximization of Queueing Networks with Simultaneous Minimization of Service Rates and Buffers
http://bit.ly/1cJuWLM

Publication

A honey-bee mating optimization algorithm for educational timetabling problems
http://bit.ly/1dhSqnm

Publication

Constructing Initial Neighbourhoods to Identify Critical Constraints
http://bit.ly/h3xfnd

Graham Kendall: Details of Requested Publication


Citation

Li, J; Pollard, S; Kendall, G; Soane, E and Davies, G Optimising risk reduction: An expected utility approach for marginal risk reduction during regulatory decision making. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 94 (11): 1729-1734, 2009.


Abstract

In practice, risk and uncertainty are essentially unavoidable in many regulation processes. Regulators frequently face a risk-benefit trade-off since zero risk is neither practicable nor affordable. Although it is accepted that cost–benefit analysis is important in many scenarios of risk management, what role it should play in a decision process is still controversial. One criticism of cost–benefit analysis is that decision makers should consider marginal benefits and costs, not present ones, in their decision making. In this paper, we investigate the problem of regulatory decision making under risk by applying expected utility theory and present a new approach of cost–benefit analysis. Directly taking into consideration the reduction of the risks, this approach achieves marginal cost–benefit analysis. By applying this approach, the optimal regulatory decision that maximizes the marginal benefit of risk reduction can be considered. This provides a transparent and reasonable criterion for stakeholders involved in the regulatory activity. An example of evaluating seismic retrofitting alternatives is provided to demonstrate the potential of the proposed approach.


pdf

You can download the pdf of this publication from here


doi

The doi for this publication is 10.1016/j.ress.2009.05.005 You can link directly to the original paper, via the doi, from here

What is a doi?: A doi (Document Object Identifier) is a unique identifier for sicientific papers (and occasionally other material). This provides direct access to the location where the original article is published using the URL http://dx.doi/org/xxxx (replacing xxx with the doi). See http://dx.doi.org/ for more information


Journal Rankings


ISI Web of Knowledge Journal Citation Reports

The Web of Knowledge Journal Citation Reports (often known as ISI Impact Factors) help measure how often an article is cited. You can get an introduction to Journal Citation Reports here. Below I have provided the ISI impact factor for the jourrnal in which this article was published. For complete information I have shown the ISI ranking over a number of years, with the latest ranking highlighted.

2013 (2.048), 2012 (1.901), 2011 (1.770), 2010 (1.897), 2009 (1.908), 2008 (1.379), 2007 (1.004), 2006 (0.920), 2005 (0.747), 2004 (0.551), 2003 (0.741), 2002 (0.700), 2001 (0.545), 2000 (0.500)

URL

This pubication does not have a URL associated with it.

The URL is only provided if there is additional information that might be useful. For example, where the entry is a book chapter, the URL might link to the book itself.


Bibtex

@ARTICLE{lpksd2009, author = {J. Li and S. Pollard and G. Kendall and E. Soane and G. Davies},
title = {Optimising risk reduction: An expected utility approach for marginal risk reduction during regulatory decision making},
journal = {Reliability Engineering and System Safety},
year = {2009},
volume = {94},
pages = {1729--1734},
number = {11},
month = {November 2009},
abstract = {In practice, risk and uncertainty are essentially unavoidable in many regulation processes. Regulators frequently face a risk-benefit trade-off since zero risk is neither practicable nor affordable. Although it is accepted that cost–benefit analysis is important in many scenarios of risk management, what role it should play in a decision process is still controversial. One criticism of cost–benefit analysis is that decision makers should consider marginal benefits and costs, not present ones, in their decision making. In this paper, we investigate the problem of regulatory decision making under risk by applying expected utility theory and present a new approach of cost–benefit analysis. Directly taking into consideration the reduction of the risks, this approach achieves marginal cost–benefit analysis. By applying this approach, the optimal regulatory decision that maximizes the marginal benefit of risk reduction can be considered. This provides a transparent and reasonable criterion for stakeholders involved in the regulatory activity. An example of evaluating seismic retrofitting alternatives is provided to demonstrate the potential of the proposed approach.},
doi = {10.1016/j.ress.2009.05.005},
keywords = {Regulatory decision making, Cost–benefit analysis, ALARP, Expected utility theory},
owner = {est},
timestamp = {2010.02.22},
webpdf = {http://www.graham-kendall.com/papers/lpksd2009.pdf} }